RE: Trust validation of programmers

arkeltex.ru
Thu, 9 Jul 1998 15:52:37 GMT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Technical Incursion Countermeasures: "Re: a long response to a Short note on new Laws"
• Previous message: tqbfpobox.com: "Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? (AG vs. SPF)"
• In reply to: Ryan Russell: "Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? (AG vs. SPF)"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

nuqneH,

"Burden, James" <JBurdencaiso.com> said :

> It is the prospective employee's job to make him/her self attractive to
> the position. Any security professional who takes the time to gain the
> certification (CISSP or other certification) has at least shown
> prospective employers their willingness to learn on their own time, and
> possesses an ambitious attitude.

..or, if you have enough real-world expirience and feel no actual need
in certification, willingness to spend time on getting a piece of paper
just to show it to morons who understand nothing in your business.
Instead of doing something really useful, say, writing security software.
Not so positive intention.

                                     _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 {::} {::} {::} CU in Hell _| o |_ | | _|| | / _||_| |_ |_ |_
 (##) (##) (##) /Arkan#iD |_ o _||_| _||_| / _| | o |_||_||_|
 [||] [||] [||] Do i believe in Bible? Hell,man,i've seen one!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNaTnQ6H/mIJW9LeBAQGTKgQAlVXVYyUsWZcEB2YazoXya0VWNEYf7onY
66kywTJ1t8KWqzBFi8BsbXT5xv4pnNRbAtmpW4EE4Q14UxTLyr+OQsuJyb5T1vWD
jXVInUORKKzFfDf4I/6etNAoBXnsa7/zDlnL2eECo5OVRwG/B1W2ZMjpDD3suNZ5
VKukx7KGQNE=
=JF5y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Next message: Technical Incursion Countermeasures: "Re: a long response to a Short note on new Laws"
• Previous message: tqbfpobox.com: "Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? (AG vs. SPF)"
• In reply to: Ryan Russell: "Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? (AG vs. SPF)"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:11:32 CDT