Re: Simple demo

arkeltex.ru
Mon, 31 Aug 1998 12:08:17 GMT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: Archive for this list?"
• Previous message: Neil Williams: "Re: securing X.25 connection"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

nuqneH,

Rik Farrow <rikspirit.com> said :

> Now for the test. Set up Checkpoint FW-1 (I tested V3.0) and Gauntlet
> (v 3.2), with the target host behind the firewall, and the firewall
> permitting access to the target hosts vulnerable IMAP server. Gauntlet,
> the AG, truncates the long login string, but Checkpoint, being SPF, does
> not. IMAP core dumps (buffer overflows) when protected by Checkpoint.

Hmm, did Gauntlet 3.2 have IMAP proxy as AG? AFAIR it was circuit gateway
there..

                                     _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 {::} {::} {::} CU in Hell _| o |_ | | _|| | / _||_| |_ |_ |_
 (##) (##) (##) /Arkan#iD |_ o _||_| _||_| / _| | o |_||_||_|
 [||] [||] [||] Do i believe in Bible? Hell,man,i've seen one!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNeqSMKH/mIJW9LeBAQHWCwQAn8LGSLrMBaYsHUXHUXgGtt8BXzkAtRhE
ukOu1tS8xnD03M82xrbcxYAqF3KjwXjXX8giyHYflsmkU9oLeOjomZUKRYlBVTs9
oSzqlQ46EiPs/+tCWYbDtLxG0wMeCZP290re0YvFdEBaAkDxRd17t/LVpPTxM0MC
qTDWzIbm9RM=
=o7c5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Next message: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: Archive for this list?"
• Previous message: Neil Williams: "Re: securing X.25 connection"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:11:46 CDT