Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware

tqbfpobox.com
Thu, 17 Sep 1998 17:50:52 -0500 (CDT)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Joseph S. D. Yao: "Re: utility for NAT"
• Previous message: Christopher Nicholls: "Re: NetMeeting security solution?"
• In reply to: Don Cox: "NetMeeting security solution?"
• Next in thread: Crispin Cowan: "Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware"
• Reply: Crispin Cowan: "Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware"

> person/company for the job... Problem is, which tools and which people do
> you trust? Sounds like the subject of certification and accreditation comes
> back into play...

Scanners are probably much easier to certify than firewalls (which
probably can't be meaningfully certified at all).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas H. Ptacek SNI Labs, Network Associates, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.pobox.com/~tqbf "If you're so special, why aren't you dead?"
                                        

• Next message: Joseph S. D. Yao: "Re: utility for NAT"
• Previous message: Christopher Nicholls: "Re: NetMeeting security solution?"
• In reply to: Don Cox: "NetMeeting security solution?"
• Next in thread: Crispin Cowan: "Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware"
• Reply: Crispin Cowan: "Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:11:46 CDT