Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware

Ryan Russell (ryanrsybase.com)
Fri, 18 Sep 1998 09:44:25 -0700

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Dave Whitlow: "Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware"
• Previous message: John McDermott: "Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware"
• Maybe in reply to: Stout, Bill: "Penetration testing via shrinkware"
• Next in thread: John McDermott: "Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware"

I think the reference was to certifying people,
not products (i.e. CISSP.)

That's a whole seperate religious war.

                    Ryan

tqbfpobox.com on 09/17/98 03:50:52 PM

Please respond to tqbfpobox.com

To: chrisnsoftway.com.au
cc: firewall-wizardsnfr.net (bcc: Ryan Russell/SYBASE)
Subject: Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware

> person/company for the job... Problem is, which tools and which people do
> you trust? Sounds like the subject of certification and accreditation
comes
> back into play...

Scanners are probably much easier to certify than firewalls (which
probably can't be meaningfully certified at all).

• Next message: Dave Whitlow: "Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware"
• Previous message: John McDermott: "Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware"
• Maybe in reply to: Stout, Bill: "Penetration testing via shrinkware"
• Next in thread: John McDermott: "Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:11:47 CDT