Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware

David Collier-Brown (davecbcanada.sun.com)
Thu, 24 Sep 1998 13:25:35 -0400

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: DIGEX Grrrrrrrrrl: "Re: [FW1] How many rules can exists in fw1 ?"
• Previous message: mhtclark.net: "Re: Watchguard Firebox"
• In reply to: Garbrick, Randy: "Watchguard Firebox"
• Next in thread: David Collier-Brown: "Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware"

Joseph S. D. Yao wrote:
> Having said that ... I haven't had time to read the SEI procedures, so
> I can't speak to them. But at least they're trying.

        Trying is good, but turning an honest try into a paper-pushing
        exercise is bad (;-))

        Alas, that appears to be what's happened with sei's cmm.

--dave (it happend to the colored-book people about the
        time of the red book: content fell to ~0) c-b

-- 
David Collier-Brown,  | Cherish your enemies.  They're harder to
185 Ellerslie Ave.,   | come by than friends and more motivated.
Willowdale, Ontario   | davecbcanada.sun.com, hobbes.ss.org
N2M 1Y3. 416-223-8968 | http://java.science.yorku.ca/~davecb

• Next message: DIGEX Grrrrrrrrrl: "Re: [FW1] How many rules can exists in fw1 ?"
• Previous message: mhtclark.net: "Re: Watchguard Firebox"
• In reply to: Garbrick, Randy: "Watchguard Firebox"
• Next in thread: David Collier-Brown: "Re: Penetration testing via shrinkware"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:11:47 CDT