Re: FW-1: Questions about DHCP and IPX (Banned by US Mil? Here wego again!)

Ryan Russell (ryanrsybase.com)
Thu, 24 Sep 1998 14:42:19 -0700

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Bill_Roydspch.gc.ca: "Re: Transparent vs. Non-transparent AGs/SPFs/whatever"
• Previous message: Woody Weaver: "Re: Transparent vs. Non-transparent AGs/SPFs/whatever"
• In reply to: Ryan Russell: "Transparent vs. Non-transparent AGs/SPFs/whatever"

Well....software running on specialized hardware, yes.

Firewall-1 (a subset, really) runs on Xylan switchs and Bay routers.

                         Ryan

"Jason L. Snowden" writes:
> Well, as I have said partially in another email, Here at Wright-Patt, the
> 88th Comm Group has forbidden us to use FW-1 due to these issues. We
have
> Xylan switches, and FW-1 can be integrated at a hardware level
> directly in the switches,

FW-1 in hardware?

Now I'm really starting to have doubts about this story.

Perry

• Next message: Bill_Roydspch.gc.ca: "Re: Transparent vs. Non-transparent AGs/SPFs/whatever"
• Previous message: Woody Weaver: "Re: Transparent vs. Non-transparent AGs/SPFs/whatever"
• In reply to: Ryan Russell: "Transparent vs. Non-transparent AGs/SPFs/whatever"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:11:47 CDT