|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
RE: Foreign Ownership, Control,and Influence
Loomis, Rip (rloomis
python.ideas.com)
Sat, 26 Sep 1998 14:11:18 -0400
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: Apology - not necessary"
- Previous message: Ryan Russell: "Re: Transparent vs. Non-transparent AGs/SPFs/whatever"
- Maybe in reply to: Ryan Russell: "Transparent vs. Non-transparent AGs/SPFs/whatever"
Duh. Corrective action below, fixing myself before someone points
out obvious holes. Root Cause was hitting [ENTER] before ingesting
second cup of coffee.
On Saturday, September 26, 1998 11:44 AM, Loomis, Rip wrote:
[[S N I P ]]
> I know that for the military GPS receivers (the Precise Positioning
> Service requires NSA keying material), the requirement to do all
> chip fabrication in US-controlled facilities has a noticeable impact
> on prices and technology.
Substitute "fabrication of security-related chips" for "all chip
fabrication". The RF stuff and much of the digital stuff in the current
generation of receivers can be done anywhere...but the security-
related chips are at 0.35 micron feature size or some such antique
number. The number of modern fabs that are both completely free
of foreign control, that have excess capacity, and that will take an
orders for less than 100,000 parts, is vanishingly small.
[[S N I P]]
> --Rip Loomis (speaking as a private citizen)
> Security Engineer, SAIC
> Gilbert.R.Loomis
cpmx.saic.com rip
clark.net
>
> P.S. Looked around for a copy of the FOCI regs on the web, and
> couldn't find them. I suspect (can't find my printed copy) that that
> means the regs are For Official Use Only, so I can't disseminate them.
Wrong again. The relevant portions of the NISPOM are of course
online...see http://www.jya.com/nispom/chapt2.htm
--Rip Loomis
rip
clark.net
- Next message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: Apology - not necessary"
- Previous message: Ryan Russell: "Re: Transparent vs. Non-transparent AGs/SPFs/whatever"
- Maybe in reply to: Ryan Russell: "Transparent vs. Non-transparent AGs/SPFs/whatever"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:11:47 CDT