Re: GXD vs. SPF

arkeltex.ru
Wed, 30 Sep 1998 13:19:35 +0400

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: JSK: "Re: are firewalls limited to only protecting ehternet connections?"
• Previous message: Andy Burns: "RE: why isn't there a newer linux fw-howto"
• In reply to: Kevin Steves: "Re: why isn't there a newer linux fw-howto"
• Next in thread: Stout, Bill: "RE: GXD vs. SPF"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

nuqneH,

"Paul D. Robertson" <probertsclark.net> said :

> By "Generic Proxy", I assume you mean transport layer relay like plug-gw,
> Socks, etc.?

btw Socks is not "generic transport layer proxy" like plug-gw, it
is a kind of "remote socket interface", which can be much more dangerous
being misconfigured.. It can allow connections _into_ the protected network
in some cases.

                                     _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 {::} {::} {::} CU in Hell _| o |_ | | _|| | / _||_| |_ |_ |_
 (##) (##) (##) /Arkan#iD |_ o _||_| _||_| / _| | o |_||_||_|
 [||] [||] [||] Do i believe in Bible? Hell,man,i've seen one!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNhH3pqH/mIJW9LeBAQFKigP/aGjO/WMb3hF9Uiq7X7+6R11eeNUibXDj
fHE/8AcvRsBv426R4/YdDi9uzJtJGB0eWtY8674lmsX5M7P2HpxSQzAJiTaGYrwg
ZtH+dEeJeHAIgK+t/2o2sXgvHO7UaYyD/bcxppfJcqL7GGkQE/VfhkVCATrGlehm
qK8Kjkhhc0U=
=m8ue
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Next message: JSK: "Re: are firewalls limited to only protecting ehternet connections?"
• Previous message: Andy Burns: "RE: why isn't there a newer linux fw-howto"
• In reply to: Kevin Steves: "Re: why isn't there a newer linux fw-howto"
• Next in thread: Stout, Bill: "RE: GXD vs. SPF"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:11:48 CDT