choke router choice

mjdinteraxon.gr
Tue, 13 Oct 1998 10:38:01 +0200

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Doug Hughes: "Re: ifconfig down (was Re: Recording slow scans"
• Previous message: Henry Hertz Hobbit: "Re: ifconfig down (was Re: Recording slow scans"
• Next in thread: Adam Shostack: "Re: choke router choice"
• Reply: Adam Shostack: "Re: choke router choice"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all

Is a 3com SuperStack II 3300 of any use a a choke 'router' (between a
perimeter and an internal network). I dont know much about them, but
perhaps the VLAN feature could be of use?? and yes I know I should
really use a router, but one does have to make use of existing
resources ..

any info much appreciated..

mike

- ----------------------------------------------
Michael J. Dilworth Interaxon ltd.
                                8 Rizariou St.
tel:(+301)6801013/4 Halandri
Fax:(+301)6801015 15233 Athens
                                Greece
- ----------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.5.3i for non-commercial use <http://www.pgpi.com>

iQA/AwUBNiL3O26RYzC+RAvaEQIxJgCfU52uirMKy5p+zsANxVBHTQLKMkAAoO+j
ZUYrIbBmULlWu7lpyl2a+kzn
=+9J8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Next message: Doug Hughes: "Re: ifconfig down (was Re: Recording slow scans"
• Previous message: Henry Hertz Hobbit: "Re: ifconfig down (was Re: Recording slow scans"
• Next in thread: Adam Shostack: "Re: choke router choice"
• Reply: Adam Shostack: "Re: choke router choice"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:11:56 CDT