|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
A good NAT for Linux
Steven Osman (sosman
terratron.com)
Tue, 1 Dec 1998 17:06:22 -0500
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Steve George: "Re: Web server inside the firewall"
- Previous message: Bob Acosta: "Re: Web server inside the firewall"
- Next in thread: Frank O'Dwyer: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Reply: Frank O'Dwyer: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Reply: pmsac: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Reply: Mailing Lists: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Maybe reply: Ivan E. Moore II: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Reply: Michael Kyle: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Reply: Smoot Carl-Mitchell: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Reply: Michael T. Shinn: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Reply: Aaron D. Turner: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Maybe reply: Steven Osman: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Reply: David Lang: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Maybe reply: Eduardo.Martin
icex.es: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Maybe reply: ark
eltex.ru: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
Anyone know of a good NAT server and proxy server (either together or as
separate packages) for Linux?
Basically what I'm trying to achieve is this :
Taking one single IP address (say, from a dialup or a DSL connection) which
may or may not be static, and fanning it out to a number of workstations
(like 6 or so), and providing them as much freedom as possible to run
different applications. I was hoping that between a www and ftp proxy, and
a socks proxy, I'd have most applications covered, and then I'd use NAT for
any off-the-wall applications that may be running.
Any ideas?
Steven
p.s. If it's free, that's better of course :)
- Next message: Steve George: "Re: Web server inside the firewall"
- Previous message: Bob Acosta: "Re: Web server inside the firewall"
- Next in thread: Frank O'Dwyer: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Reply: Frank O'Dwyer: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Reply: pmsac: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Reply: Mailing Lists: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Maybe reply: Ivan E. Moore II: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Reply: Michael Kyle: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Reply: Smoot Carl-Mitchell: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Reply: Michael T. Shinn: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Reply: Aaron D. Turner: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Maybe reply: Steven Osman: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Reply: David Lang: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Maybe reply: Eduardo.Martin
icex.es: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
- Maybe reply: ark
eltex.ru: "Re: A good NAT for Linux"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:12:10 CDT