|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
RE: Interesting Telnet scenario
Shivdasani, Meenoo (Meenoo_Shivdasani
NAI.com)
Thu, 9 Sep 1999 06:54:56 -0700
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Kelly D. Lucas: "Re: CA/RA packages for SSL and IPSEC"
- Previous message: Darren Reed: "Re: Free NAT for NT?"
- In reply to: Mikael Olsson: "Re: Free NAT for NT?"
- Next in thread: Kenneth_W_Fox
sbphrd.com: "Re: Interesting Telnet scenario"
> how can I force
> this Telnet session to use a particular source port manually
> - I know I can
> tell it to use a particular destination port, but a source
> port? Please
> feel free to correct any bad assumptions above or to provide "Basic
> Training" if it is appropriate. TIA! (Solaris 2.6 / Gauntlet 5.0)
It has to be a specific port and not just a reserved port?
I'm blanking on any proxy based solution right now, but you could use the
packet filter in combination with NAT and thus hide the internal addresses.
M
- Next message: Kelly D. Lucas: "Re: CA/RA packages for SSL and IPSEC"
- Previous message: Darren Reed: "Re: Free NAT for NT?"
- In reply to: Mikael Olsson: "Re: Free NAT for NT?"
- Next in thread: Kenneth_W_Fox
sbphrd.com: "Re: Interesting Telnet scenario"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Fri Sep 10 1999 - 06:39:10 CDT