|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: ipfwadm X ipchains
dwelch
phoneboy.com
20 Sep 1999 19:10:00 -0700
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Dominick Glavach: "Re: Intrusion Response"
- Previous message: Siglite: "Re: ipfwadm X ipchains"
- In reply to: Jan van Rensburg: "Re: ipfwadm X ipchains"
- Next in thread: William Stearns: "Re: ipfwadm X ipchains"
- Reply: William Stearns: "Re: ipfwadm X ipchains"
On Sun, 19 September 1999, William Stearns wrote:
> The 2.4.x kernel series, hopefully coming out in December, will
> support iptables. iptables has backwards compatibility modules for
> running either ipfwadm or ipchains firewalls. The native implementation
> is extensible; anyone can create new loadable modules that provide either
> new matching fields or new actions when a packet matches. For example,
> there's a module that allows matches on the source mac address.
I'd like to see:
1. Stateful packet filtering for non-MASQed stuff.
2. The ability to log somewhere other than /var/log/messages
But that's just me. Does the 2.4.x kernels have that functionality? Sounds like, if nothing else, it could be coded so it does.
-- PhoneBoy
-- Dameon D. Welch, a.k.a. PhoneBoy (dwelchphoneboy.com) Check Point FireWall-1 FAQs at http://www.phoneboy.com/fw1/ The views expressed herein are not necessarily those of anyone else.
-- Signup for your free USWEST.mail Email account http://www.uswestmail.net
- Next message: Dominick Glavach: "Re: Intrusion Response"
- Previous message: Siglite: "Re: ipfwadm X ipchains"
- In reply to: Jan van Rensburg: "Re: ipfwadm X ipchains"
- Next in thread: William Stearns: "Re: ipfwadm X ipchains"
- Reply: William Stearns: "Re: ipfwadm X ipchains"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed Sep 22 1999 - 06:16:52 CDT