OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
NFR Wizards Archives: Re: Any reason not to use PIX ?

Re: Any reason not to use PIX ?

Subject: Re: Any reason not to use PIX ?
From: Brad Van Orden (Brad.VanOrdennetisi.com)
Date: Wed Dec 08 1999 - 08:16:44 CST

Hi Gledson,

I'm of the opinion, use what you are comfortable with. First,
a firewall has to be monitored and regularly updated. This is much easier on
a platform you are comfortable with. Second, I don't believe the software
engineers at one company are any order of magnitude smarter than at another
company. I think as long as you pick a product and use it, that is the most
important factor. I don't know of any particular problems with PIX, maybe
some others on the list do.

Regards,

Brad Van Orden
Net InfraStructure, Inc
---------------------
Hi Gledson,

Eu sou da opinico, uso-me o que vocj i confortavel com. Primeiramente, um
guarda-fogo tem que ser monitorado e regularmente atualizado. Isto i muito
mais facil em uma plataforma que vocj i confortavel com. Em segundo, eu nco
acredito que as Software Engineers em uma companhia sco toda a ordem de
valor mais esperta do que em uma outra companhia. Eu penso tco por muito
tempo como vocj escolhe um produto e o usa, isso sou o fator o mais
importante. Eu nco sei de nenhuns problemas particulares com PIX, talvez
alguns outros na lista .

Consideragco,

Brad Van Orden
Net InfraStructure, Inc

Gledson Pompeu Correa Da Costa wrote:
>
> Hi there,
> ....
>
> SO, is there any reason not to use PIX (like major holes or other
> problems with the product) ? Are there better alternatives in the "black
> box" division ?
>
> Thanks in advance for all your answers.
>
> Sincerely yours,
> Gledson Pompeu
> TCU / SEINF / SENET
> Internet Service Manager

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Wed Dec 08 1999 - 21:01:21 CST