RE: DMZ, defined.

David LeBlanc (dleblancmindspring.com)
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 08:59:14 -0500

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: dreamwvr: "RE: DMZ, defined."
• Previous message: Stout, Bill: "RE: .gov/.mil threat ID"
• Maybe in reply to: AI mailer v .1 alpha: ".gov/.mil threat ID"
• Next in thread: dreamwvr: "RE: DMZ, defined."

At 09:32 PM 1/21/99 -0500, Paul D. Robertson wrote:
>On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, graham, randy wrote:
>
>> So now we have a language expert. This talk about what a DMZ "really" is
>> seems to miss one extremely important feature of language - change. Just
>
>An equally important feature of language is to use traditional meanings
>to communicate effectively.

Can we please move along here? Or perhaps take it to private e-mail? I'm
really a lot less concerned what you call something than what effect it has
on security. Same sort of thing with the ICSA stuff - what they call
themselves doesn't mean much to me - what their testing means, and what
further testing we ought to do past their tests is interesting. Nothing
personal - everyone is being polite, just that I'd really prefer to see
technical discussions instead of semantics.

David LeBlanc
dleblancmindspring.com

• Next message: dreamwvr: "RE: DMZ, defined."
• Previous message: Stout, Bill: "RE: .gov/.mil threat ID"
• Maybe in reply to: AI mailer v .1 alpha: ".gov/.mil threat ID"
• Next in thread: dreamwvr: "RE: DMZ, defined."

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:18:02 CDT