RE: Gnat Box: any comments on how good it is?

Frank W. Keeney (FKeeneyhsa.com)
Wed, 17 Mar 1999 17:09:02 -0800

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Jim Raykowski: "SSH"
• Previous message: Frank W. Keeney: "RE: strange icmp packets."
• Maybe in reply to: Darren Reed: "strange icmp packets."
• Next in thread: dreamwvr: "RE: Gnat Box: any comments on how good it is?"
• Reply: dreamwvr: "RE: Gnat Box: any comments on how good it is?"

Have you tried any nmap fragmented stealth scans against this box?

        ----------
        From: Yakov Kravets [SMTP:ygknb.com]
        Sent: Monday, March 15, 1999 1:58 PM
        To: Chris Crozier
        Cc: 'Firewall-wizards'
        Subject: Re: Gnat Box: any comments on how good it is?

        We've purchased GNATBox for internal use to replace Cisco PIX.
Basicaly
        it's a locked bsd-based box that does SPF. Without source sode
it's hard
        to verify kernel security but we did a satan and ISS scan
against it and
        it didn't show any problems. I still feel a bit freaky to put it
on the
        perimeter. However it does a good job firewalling our vendor
connections.
        One feature that I realy like is Stealth Mode. The bigest issue
for us is
        

• Next message: Jim Raykowski: "SSH"
• Previous message: Frank W. Keeney: "RE: strange icmp packets."
• Maybe in reply to: Darren Reed: "strange icmp packets."
• Next in thread: dreamwvr: "RE: Gnat Box: any comments on how good it is?"
• Reply: dreamwvr: "RE: Gnat Box: any comments on how good it is?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:18:16 CDT