RE: Firewall comparison in Data Communications

Brian Steele (steele_bspiceisle.com)
Mon, 31 May 1999 08:17:26 -0400

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Ge' Weijers: "Re: Firewall comparison in Data Communications"
• Previous message: Andrew Fessler: "Re: Interesting DNS Traffic"
• Next in thread: Ray Hooker: "RE: Firewall comparison in Data Communications"
• Reply: Ray Hooker: "RE: Firewall comparison in Data Communications"
• Reply: David T. Smith: "RE: Firewall comparison in Data Communications"
• Reply: Alexander Schreiber: "RE: Firewall comparison in Data Communications"
• Reply: Chris Brenton: "Re: Firewall comparison in Data Communications"

<newbie-mode>What's a "source-routed packet"? And what danger does it pose
to a Firewall?</newbie-mode>

Brian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: firewalls-ownerlists.gnac.net
> [mailto:firewalls-ownerlists.gnac.net]On Behalf Of Nicolas FISCHBACH
> Sent: Saturday, May 29, 1999 5:22 PM
> To: Matt Curtin
> Cc: firewall-wizardsnfr.net; firewallslists.gnac.net
> Subject: Re: Firewall comparison in Data Communications
>
>
> Matt Curtin wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. I saw no mention of attempts to source-route traffic.
> >
> > I have been told that NT doesn't have the ability to detect and block
> > source-routed packets.

• Next message: Ge' Weijers: "Re: Firewall comparison in Data Communications"
• Previous message: Andrew Fessler: "Re: Interesting DNS Traffic"
• Next in thread: Ray Hooker: "RE: Firewall comparison in Data Communications"
• Reply: Ray Hooker: "RE: Firewall comparison in Data Communications"
• Reply: David T. Smith: "RE: Firewall comparison in Data Communications"
• Reply: Alexander Schreiber: "RE: Firewall comparison in Data Communications"
• Reply: Chris Brenton: "Re: Firewall comparison in Data Communications"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:18:59 CDT