|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Anybody have a clue why...
Will Kempf (wgkempf
2access.com)
Wed, 02 Jun 1999 17:28:30 -0500
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: David Newman: "RE: Firewall comparison in Data Communications"
- Previous message: Vern Paxson: "Re: Interesting DNS Traffic"
- Next in thread: Geva Patz: "Re: Anybody have a clue why..."
- Maybe reply: Geva Patz: "Re: Anybody have a clue why..."
- Reply: Ge' Weijers: "Re: Anybody have a clue why..."
- Reply: Andrew Brown: "Re: Anybody have a clue why..."
- Maybe reply: Steven M. Bellovin: "Re: Anybody have a clue why..."
- Reply: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: Anybody have a clue why..."
...passive ftp won't work from command line through Firewall-1?
Windows clients such as WS_FTP and Netscape work just fine when set to
passive mode. When I do a "quote PASV" in a command line ftp session (Unix
or Windows command line clients), the server says its entering passive mode,
but a list or file transfer in either direction just hangs.
The Firewall-1 policy has "enable passive ftp transfers" selected in the
properties.
TIA
Will
- Next message: David Newman: "RE: Firewall comparison in Data Communications"
- Previous message: Vern Paxson: "Re: Interesting DNS Traffic"
- Next in thread: Geva Patz: "Re: Anybody have a clue why..."
- Maybe reply: Geva Patz: "Re: Anybody have a clue why..."
- Reply: Ge' Weijers: "Re: Anybody have a clue why..."
- Reply: Andrew Brown: "Re: Anybody have a clue why..."
- Maybe reply: Steven M. Bellovin: "Re: Anybody have a clue why..."
- Reply: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: Anybody have a clue why..."
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:18:59 CDT