Re: Network Security Scanning

Adam Shostack (adamhomeport.org)
Fri, 2 Jul 1999 11:53:52 -0400

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Greg Nowicki: "TCP port 7 traffic from DoubleClick"
• Previous message: S. Jonah Pressman: "Re: Defaced Web pages"
• In reply to: Wood, Tom D: "Defaced Web pages"
• Next in thread: Matt Doughty: "Re: Network Security Scanning"
• Reply: Matt Doughty: "Re: Network Security Scanning"

Gosh, I hope not. The folks I know at Securify are much more into
protecting interesting information than trying to hide IP addresses.
If they got into that sort of obscurity without cause, my respect for
them would plummet.

Adam

On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 05:28:38AM -0700, Chris St.Clair wrote:
| >Our company has a staff of around 40 Network Security Consultants to
| >perform just about any security audits, evaluations, etc.
| >
|
| Would any of them consider it bad practice to advertise your
| internal IP scheme in your e-mail headers?
|
| >Received: from unknown(10.5.63.6) by relay.veriguard.com via smap >(4.1)id
| >xma000908; Tue, 29 Jun 99 16:02:18 -0700
| >Received: from securify.com (psyche.securify.com [10.5.63.231])by
| > >dude.veriguard.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA32647for
| > ><firewall-wizardsnfr.net>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:47:12 -0700
|
|
| ______________________________________________________
| Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume

• Next message: Greg Nowicki: "TCP port 7 traffic from DoubleClick"
• Previous message: S. Jonah Pressman: "Re: Defaced Web pages"
• In reply to: Wood, Tom D: "Defaced Web pages"
• Next in thread: Matt Doughty: "Re: Network Security Scanning"
• Reply: Matt Doughty: "Re: Network Security Scanning"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:19:02 CDT