|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: TCP port 7 traffic from DoubleClick
C. Harald Koch (chk
pobox.com)
Mon, 05 Jul 1999 19:11:33 -0400
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: sean.kelly
lanston.com: "RE: Extreme Hacking"
- Previous message: Paul Woodie: "Re: Extreme Hacking"
- In reply to: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: Extreme Hacking"
- Next in thread: Joseph S D Yao: "Re: TCP port 7 traffic from DoubleClick"
- Reply: Joseph S D Yao: "Re: TCP port 7 traffic from DoubleClick"
In message <990601185533.SAA21008
gateway.mikon.com>, Greg Nowicki writes:
> My firewall has been logging a persistent stream of TCP connection attempts
> to port 7 (echo) from six hosts belonging to DoubleClick. I would like to
> know if anyone else on the list has observed this?
Here's a message discussing the issue, rumoured to be from the source:
-- Harald Koch <chkpobox.com>
attached mail follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dear Sir, We are currently using the product GlobalDispatch from Resonate Inc. for our Wide Area Data Distribution. Please see letter below for a detail explaination on this product. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Alex Ng Doubleclick --------------------
Hello Sir, Alex at Doubleclick asked us to work with you regarding this ticket. We have reason to believe that the reports you've received regarding these three machines being compromised is a misunderstanding as a result of our enterprise traffic management software: Global Dispatch. Global Dispatch is a WAN-based scheduler that makes it easy to place content close to geographically dispersed users and and intelligently directs requests to the best-suited Point of Presence (POP). In the course of determining the best suited POP, Global Dispatch preforms a latency measurement. This latency measurement is done by making a connection to the client DNS server on TCP port 7 and then dropping the connection. After the latency measurement has been done, the latency values are cached, and the IP of the most responsive POP is returned to the requesting machine. I hope this help clear up the confusion. We are looking into other ways to preform this latency mesurment, and hope we have not caused you any inconvenience.
-- Resonate Technical Support <supportresonate.com> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Richard Day Call Center Manager
Resonate, Inc. 465 Fairchild Drive Suite 115 Mountain View, CA 94040
Main Phone 650 967.6500 Fax 650 967.6561 Support Line 650 967.4800 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Virtually
Raymond D. Mereniuk Raymond
fbn.bc.ca "The Ultimate Enterprise Security Experts" http://www.fbn.bc.ca/sysecurt.html
- Next message: sean.kelly
lanston.com: "RE: Extreme Hacking"
- Previous message: Paul Woodie: "Re: Extreme Hacking"
- In reply to: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: Extreme Hacking"
- Next in thread: Joseph S D Yao: "Re: TCP port 7 traffic from DoubleClick"
- Reply: Joseph S D Yao: "Re: TCP port 7 traffic from DoubleClick"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:19:02 CDT