|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] FW-1 throughput question
From: Darren Reed (darrenr
reed.wattle.id.au)Date: Tue May 23 2000 - 18:27:19 CDT
- Next message: Ryan Russell: "Re: [fw-wiz] firewall architectures"
- Previous message: Ejovi Nuwere: "RE: [fw-wiz] Differences between firewall-packages like FW-1 and packetfilter"
- In reply to: Rogue Bolo: "Re: [fw-wiz] FW-1 throughput question"
- Reply: Darren Reed: "Re: [fw-wiz] FW-1 throughput question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In some email I received from Rogue Bolo, sie wrote:
> Check Point v4.1 definitely does not take advantage of
> multiple processors any more than v4.0 did. The
> advantage here in use of multiple processors is to use
> the secondaries for things like WebSense, AV, etc.
> i.e. any external security server.
All the sorts of things which have a dubious place on a firewall.
Darren
- Next message: Ryan Russell: "Re: [fw-wiz] firewall architectures"
- Previous message: Ejovi Nuwere: "RE: [fw-wiz] Differences between firewall-packages like FW-1 and packetfilter"
- In reply to: Rogue Bolo: "Re: [fw-wiz] FW-1 throughput question"
- Reply: Darren Reed: "Re: [fw-wiz] FW-1 throughput question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]