|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Safe scanning
From: Teolicy (teolicy
mindless.com)Date: Tue Mar 21 2000 - 13:33:03 CST
- Next message: Simple Nomad: "Re: distributed nmap?"
- Previous message: Jose Nazario: "Re: distrbuted nmap?"
- Next in thread: andy lowton: "Re: Safe scanning"
- Reply: Bruce Fraser: "Re: Safe scanning"
- Reply: Alek O. Komarnitsky: "Re: Safe scanning"
- Reply: James D. Watson: "Re: Safe scanning"
- Reply: Jonathan Day: "Re: Safe scanning"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
#include <stdthanks.h> // to Fyodor the man
Hello folks,
I've been lurking here for a while, and am on the verge of doing a pretty
big scan on a pretty big and /very/ varied net, of which I have little
control. I know that it's more than likely that this network has a few
fragile/semi-home-made stacks in it.
Alek O.K.'s recent post (subj: "Setting nmap host_timeout too low may cause
DoS on inetd (?)") kinda spooked me.
How often or likely is it that nmap would trash a host (I'm considering
low-volume, something circa a class B per night, over a month)? Does anyone
have any experience with "safetifying" nmap scans? Are there any scans that
are more dangerous than others?
I've read the manpage and most of the webpage, and I realize that there are
no guarantees. But I'm looking for real-life-experience - is "nmap -sT
10.10.1-254.1-254" likely to put me in the street?
Thanks,
- Teo
--------------------------------------------------
For help using this (nmap-hackers) mailing list, send a blank email to
nmap-hackers-help
insecure.org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org).
- Next message: Simple Nomad: "Re: distributed nmap?"
- Previous message: Jose Nazario: "Re: distrbuted nmap?"
- Next in thread: andy lowton: "Re: Safe scanning"
- Reply: Bruce Fraser: "Re: Safe scanning"
- Reply: Alek O. Komarnitsky: "Re: Safe scanning"
- Reply: James D. Watson: "Re: Safe scanning"
- Reply: Jonathan Day: "Re: Safe scanning"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]