|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: UDP137 connection attempts v1.1
- To: NTBUGTRAQ
LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM - Subject: Re: UDP137 connection attempts v1.1
- From: Russ <Russ.Cooper
RC.ON.CA> - Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 13:39:38 -0500
- Approved-By: Russ.Cooper
RC.ON.CA - Reply-To: Russ <Russ.Cooper
RC.ON.CA> - Sender: Windows NT BugTraq Mailing List <NTBUGTRAQ
LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM>
Ok, revision 1.1...;-] "Enable DNS for Windows Resolution", and "h-nodes" or NodeType, have NOTHING TO DO WITH IT...;-] Both pertain, seemingly, only to forward resolutions (i.e. name -> IP). Enable DNS for Windows Resolution determines whether NetBIOS names will have domain names added to them and be sent to a DNS server for lookup. NodeType determines whether or not to even try a DNS lookup for a NetBIOS name. The only thing that appears to use a unicast NetBIOS Adapter Status Query is Winsock gethostbyaddr(), or an inverse lookup of an IP -> name, and this action is not affected by either of the two factors above. Unfortunately, no nice flow diagrams exist in TechNet to explain the difference between gethostbyaddr() and gethostbyname(). The radical approach of removing the Name Space Provider should still be effective. One would think, however, that there would be equivalent mechanisms for controlling these two functions independently since many of the controls on gethostbyname() don't affect gethostbyaddr(). Cheers, Russ - NTBugtraq moderator
- Prev by Date: Event ID 4183 - Authentication failure via ESMTP AUTH LOGIN on Ex change Server
- Next by Date: Re: User Logout Bug <long>
- Prev by thread: Event ID 4183 - Authentication failure via ESMTP AUTH LOGIN on Ex change Server
- Next by thread: TCP Sequence Number
- Index(es):