|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
More MS Y2K non-compliance... (fwd)
- To: NTBUGTRAQ
LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM - Subject: More MS Y2K non-compliance... (fwd)
- From: Steven Kastl <skastl
WIRETRIP.NET> - Date: Wed, 25 Mar 1998 10:04:00 -0600
- Reply-To: Steven Kastl <skastl
WIRETRIP.NET> - Sender: Windows NT BugTraq Mailing List <NTBUGTRAQ
LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM>
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 1998 10:00:41 -0600 (CST) From: Steven Kastl <skastlwiretrip.net> To: NTGUBTRAQ
LISTSERV.ORG Cc: BUGTRAQ
NETSPACE.ORG Subject: More MS Y2K non-compliance... This is a bug, not an exploit Product(s): MSSQL Server 6.5 (SP3) Windows NT 4.0 (SP3) Problem: Y2K is a leap year (before we go any further on this issue, check your sources, because it is...). A scheduled backup job for 02-29-2000 cannot be entered. Dates 02-28 and 03-01 can be entered, and the day of week is appropriately changed (i.e. from Monday 02-28 to Wednesday 03-01). No other functionality of SQL Server seems to be impaired (all other tests passed). Microsoft has been notified. I have looked in the MS KB and found nothing relating to this issue. Comments welcome Regards, --Steve Kastl ---------------------------------------------------- MCP, Windows NT 3.51/4.0 | please reply to: Certified UNIX Sysadmin | skastl
mcs.net Network Systems Engineer | skastl
wiretrip.net ----------------------------------------------------
- Prev by Date: Re: NT Screen Saver Password Protect Bug
- Next by Date: NTCrash2
- Prev by thread: Re: Stubborn Licenses
- Next by thread: Re: More MS Y2K non-compliance... (fwd)
- Index(es):