|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NT Screen Saver Password Protect Bug
- To: NTBUGTRAQ
LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM - Subject: Re: NT Screen Saver Password Protect Bug
- From: Steve Birnbaum <sbirn
SECURITY.ORG.IL> - Date: Sat, 28 Mar 1998 02:18:19 +0300
- Comments: cc: Paul Leach <paulle
MICROSOFT.COM>, David Hiers <USFTLTV9
IBMMAIL.COM> - In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 27 Mar 1998 11:55:33 -0800."
- Reply-To: Steve Birnbaum <sbirn
SECURITY.ORG.IL> - Sender: Windows NT BugTraq Mailing List <NTBUGTRAQ
LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM>
> However, it is an UNSOLVABLE problem, and so > fixing one instance is useless and can only lead to a false sense of > security. I never thought I'd find myself agreeing with Paul, but stranger things have happened (though not many <g>). NT is not B1 or B2 rated. I haven't heard about it being rated C2 with a NIC. So why are people sitting here comparing it to such systems? If you want such a system, go talk to Argus systems or some other vendor who'se OS meets your security requirements. As long as the admin is a superuser, what differences does it make *HOW* he is able to use your account? If it's not one way, it's another. Forget software, maybe the keyboard is specially wired to record your keystrokes and send them via a wireless transmitter to a receiving device on the admin's desk? Go find that in your audit log. Like Paul said, if you can't trust the admin don't touch the computer. Steve --- sbirnsecurity.org.il Phone: +972-2-6795860 (PGP key available) Fight Internet Spam! http://www.vix.com/spam/ Disclaimer: My opinions only.
- Prev by Date: Re: NT Screen Saver Password Protect Bug
- Next by Date: Rogue Admin protection
- Prev by thread: Re: NT Screen Saver Password Protect Bug
- Next by thread: Stubborn Licenses
- Index(es):