|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Rogue Admin protection
- To: NTBUGTRAQ
LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM - Subject: Rogue Admin protection
- From: "McGregor, Byron" <BMcGregor
BCBC.BC.CA> - Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 16:46:26 -0800
- Reply-To: "McGregor, Byron" <BMcGregor
BCBC.BC.CA> - Sender: Windows NT BugTraq Mailing List <NTBUGTRAQ
LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM>
The interesting sub-topic on the recent screen saver thread has been the idea of protecting systems from malicious admins. The simple question to be answered is "can an OS do this?" The answer is an unequivocal "no". The OS can put up obstacles in the form of audit trails and distributed admin responsibilities. But Paul Leach's reminder of the existence of trojans is the final answer to the question. The observation that I would like to make here is that, when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. We are generally systems specialists and can easily fall into the trap of thinking that our systems tools hold the answer to all our woes. In fact, security against rogue admins is properly addressed through the tools of management oversight, corporate security practices, HR screening procedures, and, in some cases, the criminal justice system. Granted, these are not as much fun as code - but at least they stand a chance of successfully addressing the issue. Byron McGregor B.C. Buildings Corp. Victoria, B.C., CA
- Prev by Date: Re: NT Screen Saver Password Protect Bug
- Next by Date: B1/2 and untrustworthy admins
- Prev by thread: Re: What does "map" mean in this context?
- Next by thread: B1/2 and untrustworthy admins
- Index(es):