|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Session ttl and virtual memory (was: RE: Max file transfer size of 1.3GB?)
- To: NTBUGTRAQ
LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM - Subject: Re: Session ttl and virtual memory (was: RE: Max file transfer size of 1.3GB?)
- From: thoth
PURPLEFROG.COM - Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 17:29:21 -0400
- Comments: cc: takes a licking and keeps on ticking <dog
gainesville.fl.us> - In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 29 Apr 1998 13:35:35 EDT." <199804292108.RAA47260
lists.ufl.edu> - Reply-To: thoth
PURPLEFROG.COM - Sender: Windows NT BugTraq Mailing List <NTBUGTRAQ
LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM>
"Stout, William" <StoutWPIONEER-STANDARD.COM> ,in message <199804292108.RAA472 60
lists.ufl.edu>, wrote: > They do have continuing challenges with firewalling applications that > use random higher number ports (20000-30000). [Sigh] clearly any portmapper-using thing that you might want to run through a packet filter needs to have a way to set the port to a fixed number so you can give it a clause in the packet filter. I have impressed this upon the CODA project crewmembers. Spread the word. Dave, tell Sun. All you other doggers, doo what you doo best. -- Bob Forsman thoth
gainesville.fl.us http://www.gainesville.fl.us/~thoth/
- Prev by Date: Session ttl and virtual memory (was: RE: Max file transfer size of 1.3GB?)
- Next by Date: Re: Is PPTP secure?
- Prev by thread: Session ttl and virtual memory (was: RE: Max file transfer size of 1.3GB?)
- Next by thread: Setup Bug
- Index(es):