Instead of doing my own advisory, i want to add :
-Microsoft Sql Server 7 also is vulnerable, the only
difference is that in Sql Server 2000 only members of
sysadmin and bulkadmin role can exec BULK INSERT and
in Sql Server 7 only members of sysadmin can exec BULK
INSERT, so the risk is lower in Sql Server 7.

-To reproduce the unicode buffer overflow:
BULK INSERT tablename FROM 'XXXXXXX....'

Cesar Cerrudo.

--- NGSSoftware Insight Security Research
<nisrnextgenss.com> wrote:
> NGSSoftware Insight Security Research Advisory
>
> Name: BULK INSERT Buffer Overflow
> Systems Affected: Microsoft SQL Server 2000
> Severity: Medium
> Category: Buffer Overrun
> Vendor URL: http://www.microsoft.com/
> Authors: Mark Litchfield (markngssoftware.com)
> Advisory URL:
> http://www.ngssoftware.com/advisories/ms-sqlbi.txt
> Date: 11th July 2002
> Advisory number: #NISR11072002
> VNA Reference:
> http://www.nextgenss.com/vna/ms-sql.txt
>
> [Please note that this advisory relates to one of
> the issues discussed in
> the SQL Server VNA. There are still more to be
> fixed.]
>
>
> Description
> ***********
> Microsoft's SQL Server 2000 contains functionality
> that allows a database
> owner to populate a table with data with one fell
> swoop using the 'BULK
> INSERT' query. This functionality contains a
> remotely exploitable buffer
> overrun vulnerability that can be exploited by an
> attacker to run arbitrary
> code.
>
>
> Details
> *******
> The 'BULK INSERT' query will take a user supplied
> file name and insert the
> contents of this file into a specified table. By
> supplying an overly long
> filename to the query, a buffer is overflowed and
> the saved return address
> stored on the stack is overwritten. This allows the
> attacker to gain control
> over the process'
> execution. SQL Server 2000 can be run in the
> security context of a domain
> account or LOCAL SYSTEM, so depending upon the
> particular setup, an attacker
> may be able to gain complete control over the
> vulnerable system.
>
> To be able to use the 'BULK INSERT' query one must
> have the privileges of
> the database owner or dbo. Note this does not
> necessarily imply 'sa'
> equivalence.
>
> Another point to note is that whilst this overflow
> is 'UNICODE' in nature by
> supplying code as a UNICODE string exploitation is
> made easier.
>
> Fix Information
> ***************
> NGSSoftware alerted Microsoft to this problem on the
> 28th May 2002.
> Microsoft have created a patch.
>
> Please see their bulletin for more details:
>
>
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/
> bulletin/MS02-034.asp
>
> Whilst NGSSoftware rate this as a medium risk issue,
> we still urge customers
> to apply the patch as soon as is possible as it
> contains fixes for other
> issues such as a buffer overflow in the pwdencrypt()
> function.
>
> Further Information
> *******************
>
> For further information about the scope and effects
> of buffer overflows,
> please see
>
>
http://www.ngssoftware.com/papers/non-stack-bo-windows.pdf
>
http://www.ngssoftware.com/papers/ntbufferoverflow.html
>
http://www.ngssoftware.com/papers/bufferoverflowpaper.rtf
> http://www.ngssoftware.com/papers/unicodebo.pdf
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]