OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Henning Brauer (lists-openbsdportsbsws.de)
Date: Tue Sep 04 2001 - 15:29:33 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 08:15:54PM -0000, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
    > What is the harm of using /package? If the author releases a package in
    > /package, why would you want to move it somewhere else?

    What is the harm of using /henningsfavoriteinstalllocaltion? If I release a
    package in /henningsfavoriteinstalllocation, why would one want to move it
    somewhere else?

    What is the harm of using /theosgreatsoftware?
    What about /heikkiwritesgoodsoftwaretoo?
    And /artisagreatprogrammer?

    Don't get me wrong, the /package concept makes sense IMHO. But if every
    author releases his software using /myfavoritelocationoutsideusrlocal we get
    a big chaos. The OpenBSD ports tree allows anyone to install the packages in
    /package quite easy. The authors may not like that. But they don't force us
    to use /opt/anything or whatever they prefer. This allows consistency
    within the system. You are trying to force us to use /package.
    _that's_ the issue, not /package itself.

    -- 
    * Henning Brauer, hostmasterbsws.de, http://www.bsws.de *
    * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany               *
    Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
    (Dennis Ritchie)