|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Darren Reed (avalon
coombs.anu.edu.au)Date: Mon Jun 03 2002 - 11:54:56 CDT
In some mail from Daniel Hartmeier, sie said:
>
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 03:03:37PM +0200, Jedi/Sector One wrote:
>
> > Yes, and it should be reimplemented in different and incompatible ways for
> > every server.
>
> One thing I'm considering for pf is adding a parameter to 'keep state'
> that limits the number of concurrent states a particular rule can
> create.
Next major rev. of ipf already has that.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]