OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Strickland Joshua A Amn 690ISS/DOR (Joshua.Strickland2LACKLAND.AF.MIL)
Date: Mon Jun 03 2002 - 12:15:12 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

    With how many lines of code there are in IPF, you gotta wonder WHAT all it
    has.
    -Josh

    -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
    GAT$ d--(?) s-:- !a>? C+++$ UB+++ P+>+++ L->--- E--- W++>+++ N++ o- K->--
    w+(--) O?>++ M V-- PS--- PE Y+ PGP t+ 5-- X+ R tv b++>+++ DI++ D+++
    G+>+++ e+>(++*) h+>(++*) r--->(+*) y?(**)
    ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
    http://www.geekcode.com/

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Darren Reed [mailto:avaloncoombs.anu.edu.au]
    Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:55 AM
    To: danielbenzedrine.cx
    Cc: miscopenbsd.org
    Subject: Re: pf compatiblity w/ other unix OS

    In some mail from Daniel Hartmeier, sie said:
    >
    > On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 03:03:37PM +0200, Jedi/Sector One wrote:
    >
    > > Yes, and it should be reimplemented in different and incompatible ways
    for
    > > every server.
    >
    > One thing I'm considering for pf is adding a parameter to 'keep state'
    > that limits the number of concurrent states a particular rule can
    > create.

    Next major rev. of ipf already has that.

    Classification: UNCLASSIFIED