> > Various people, including myself, were concerned about that 'and every
> > other static binary' line in the resolver patch, so I did something about
> > it....
>
> It's not just static binaries you need to worry about. You also
> have to worry about dynamic binaries linked with older libc revisions.

Shouldn't that be mentioned in the patch?

Although a thorough search on my system found no such binaries....

Oh - I just found another static binary - /var/named/named-xfer.
Why that's in /var is a good question.

And I suppose I should add ld.so. I guess I'll have to post a revision of
that script.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]