|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Raymond C. Rodgers (obsd_at_bbnk.dhs.org)
Date: Thu Jan 02 2003 - 00:35:23 CST
Hmm... no comments on this? Theo? Beuller? Anyone?
At 10:41 PM 12/27/2002, you wrote:
>Hello everyone,
> Today I started working on the challenge of getting my SendMail
> installation configured to relay through my ISP's SMTP server which
> requires authentication. I found tips here and there, and posted a
> message to a pair of newsgroups about this, but I came up short.
>
> The apparent reason for its failure is that OpenBSD 3.2 by default
> apparently doesn't include the SASL library which handles the SendMail
> authentication support. I foolishly assumed that since OpenBSD 3.2
> (-stable) includes SendMail 8.12.6 that the authentication support (and
> all its libraries) would be included by default.
>
>So, I made an easy mistake. :-)
>
>So, I'd like to ask a few questions on this subject:
>1. Why wasn't SASL included in OpenBSD 3.2? Did it not pass security
>testing or something?
>2. If it wasn't dropped for security reasons, why was it not included as
>part of a compile time configuration option?
>3. Why doesn't information on configuring SendMail for authentication
>support appear in the OpenBSD faqs? Considering that OpenBSD is the secure
>BSD, it seems to me that configuring SendMail to be a bit tighter should
>be covered as part of the OpenBSD faqs, regardless of whether or not SASL
>is included by default.
>4. Assuming that SASL can pass the OpenBSD team's security screening, how
>much interest would there need to be to get it included as part of the
>default distribution? (Even if SendMail isn't configured by default to use it.)
>
>All of my questions are null and void if SASL isn't very security
>conscious, but I found the whole situation frustrating. Would it be simple
>for me to get SendMail's authentication going by installing the SASL port
>in the ports tree? Or would I need to do a whole lot of compiling and
>reconfiguring? (I've already broken somethings this week by compiling and
>installing a newer version of PostgreSQL... I'd rather not break a lot
>more... :-) )
>
>In any event, my thanks to the OpenBSD team for all the great work.
>Raymond
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]