|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: softupdates recommendation
From: Michael Erdely (mike
erdelynet.com)
Date: Wed Jul 02 2003 - 19:30:55 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
grep include /usr/src/sys/arch/`uname -m`/conf/GENERIC
grep FFS_SOFTUPDATES /usr/src/sys/conf/GENERIC
-ME
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-misc
openbsd.org [mailto:owner-misc
openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
Sancho2k.net Lists
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 8:22 PM
To: misc
openbsd.org
Subject: Re: softupdates recommendation
Marco Peereboom wrote:
> I use softupdates just about everywhere. Sure there are corner cases where
one
> can loose some data however I (usually) prefer the performace boost over
the
> potential to loose data. Keywords here are UPS, stability and easily
> recreated/restored data.
One last thing then; from the FAQ:
To use Soft Updates, your kernel must have
option FFS_SOFTUPDATES
compiled in, this is already in place on GENERIC.
I can't find any such reference to FFS_SOFTUPDATES in GENERIC; is it
just there, but not listed as an option?
DS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]