From: Alex de Joode (usurazedz.net)
Date: Mon Jun 14 2004 - 13:13:15 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 09:10:57AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I've rejected such focused approaches.
>
> We already depend on the scattered donations that come in to be
> allocated to cover a variety of fixed and random costs that we have.
> I feel that allowing anyone to say where a donation should go will
> create a situation where people believe that they should say where
> their money should go. And if most people donating started funding
> the latest gimmick or fad that they believed in, we would soon find
> that we have no electricity.
>
> We've been at this for a while, and our efforts have been a good
> reward for the donations and such... so why not just trust we do the
> right thing with the donations?

You refused 100 euro's I sent to you via moneybookers.com, is that an
example of 'we do the right thing with the donations' ?

--
Exit! Stage Left!

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]