|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: NTP daemon, from base or ports?
From: Graeme Lee (graemel
omniconnect.com.au)
Date: Thu Jul 01 2004 - 22:27:51 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I have access to 3 HP GPS Clocks (rebadged symmetricom), but only 1
antenna. I could crank 1 up for ntpd stratum 1 testing and give a
developer access if required.
Graeme
Ben Goren wrote:
>On 2004 Jul 1, at 5:22 PM, Peter Hessler wrote:
>
>
>
>>As soon as in-tree updates from other stratum servers, I'll be getting
>>rid
>>of ports ntp.
>>
>>
>
>As will, I'm sure, I and everybody else who runs OpenBSD and ntp. Which
>brings up an interesting question: will OpenBSD's ntp be available on
>other platforms? There's precedent with ssh and pf, at least.
>
>I don't recall actually hearing of anybody who's fond of the ntp.org
>implementation; it's more a matter that it's the only game in town.
>Yeah, I'm sure there're those who love it, but they're certainly
>neither vocal nor visible.
>
>I could easily see a portable ntp from OpenBSD rapidly becoming the new
>darling of the 'Net.
>
>Gee, another thought just occurred to me. If I were running an ntp
>server that had Theo's blessing on it, I'd unblock port 123 on every
>publicly-routable machine I control. Again, I suspect many others
>would, too. We could have a sudden proliferation of publicly-accessible
>servers, which would only be a good thing.
>
>Hmmm...anybody know how cheaply one can get a GPS clock?
>
>Cheers,
>
>b&
>
>[demime 0.98d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of PGP.sig]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]