|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: sane kern.maxclusters value ?
From: Ted Unangst (tedu
zeitbombe.org)
Date: Mon Jul 26 2004 - 21:04:53 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, darknoth wrote:
> I never had any problems up until I switched to -CURRENT. With 3.3, 3.4
> and 3.5 all was well. It's only since the introduction of this new
> system to replace nmbclusters that I'm getting problems and the worst is
> I'm not running out of ram ( it occurs at about 200Mbytes out of 512).
> So I doubt the issue is related to the applications or hardware.
find out what the buffered data is doing, or where it is. why is your
computer buffering data and not processing it? netstat will help.
if you kill one daemon at a time (squid, apache, dns) and get a whole
bunch of clsuters back, that's the slow one. if you kill them all, and
get no clusters back, it's a leak in the kernel and more information about
your setup would be nice.
but "make maxclusters bigger" is not the solution.
--
quit whining you haven't done anything wrong
because frankly you haven't done much of anything
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]