From: Jim Dew (jdewyggdrasil.ca)
Date: Sun Jan 02 2005 - 20:59:07 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 03:11:38AM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 03:49:42PM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
> > >Using systrace isn't funny for bulk builds, since it slows things
> > >down. However, for working on specific ports, it just rocks.
> >
> > Should systrace be used for ports known to misbehave, like the ones that
> > WRITES_TO_HOME?
>
> Whenever make build or make fake in a port tries to access anything
> not permitted in /usr/ports/infrastructure/db/systrace.filter, I
> would classify this port as broken. In short: systrace *should* be
> used when working on a port (IMHO).
>
> BTW: which ports are you talking about? I'm not aware of such bad
> beasts.
>
> Ciao,
> Kili
>

print/htmldoc for one. (/htmldoc-1.8.23_writes_to_HOME)

--
"Most moms teach their daughters how to run a house, but you? You teach
yours the fine art of mass destruction."
      - Nabs - Goodbye is not forever

perl -le '$_="6110>374086;2064208213:90<307;55";tr[0->][ LEOR!AUBGNSTY];print'

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]