From: Jeffrey Lim (jfs.worldgmail.com)
Date: Fri Jul 01 2005 - 22:04:34 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

how about the mail store then? I suppose there'll have to be some
coordinated (and "thread-friendly") back-end mail store in place for
these front-end mail servers (*i'm assuming simplistic load-balancing
here - at the tcp level, rather than at the application level, or
splitting via userid, so that the different userids are actually
assigned to different mailstores).

-jf

On 7/2/05, Bob Beck <beckbofh.cns.ualberta.ca> wrote:
>
>
> I concur. mail load is ideally suited for dividing up
> amongst multiple machines (with then multiple i/o busses, etc. etc.).
>
> I far prefer this method to the one big machine method.
>
> -Bob

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]