From: Ted Unangst (teduzeitbombe.org)
Date: Fri Jul 01 2005 - 22:16:17 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, poncenby wrote:

> > Why? OpenBSD's libc is pretty slim already. If you have need of a
> > further cut-down libc, you could trim it more.
>
> Because I want dietlibc for a fnord installation and haven't got the time or
> experience to fiddle around and get fnord to work with anything but dietlibc.
> any chance of pointing me in the right direction?

you don't have the ability to fix fnord, but you're going to port dietlibc
to a new OS? if fnord will only work with dietlibc, seems like that's
the problem and you should tell the author to fix it.

--
And that's why Abbie Hoffman was such a boon for them.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]