From: Ted Unangst (teduzeitbombe.org)
Date: Thu Sep 01 2005 - 16:03:03 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Diego Augusto Dalmolin wrote:

> because this server also handle spamd/squid/ftp-proxy...
> I4ve forgotten to mention that..

that would have been helpful to know. but if your proxy has a backlog of
128 connections, a backlog of 129 or even 3456 connections is not going to
help.

i don't understand why people keep asking the same question. if there
were some "fast" sysctl knob, why would we set it to "slow"? why would
there even be such a retarded knob?

any application that remotely cares about performance should be using
setsockopt to control the buffer size.

if you want help, your post should start "we have this router and i expect
it to be going that fast, but it only goes this fast." if your router is
already "fast enough", it can't get any faster. there's a only finite
number of clients, porn, and pipe to connect them.

--
And that's why I'm in New York.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]