From: Lars Weste (lwestegmx.de)
Date: Wed Mar 01 2006 - 09:01:11 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Sebastian, Henning,

> --- Urspr|ngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: Sebastian Schmitzdorff <sebastian.schmitzdorffde.easynet.net>
> An: miscopenbsd.org
> Kopie: Lars Weste <lwestegmx.de>
> Betreff: Re: upl(4) interface not working
> Datum: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:15:07 +0100
>
> I'm not much of an network expert but wouldn't it help to use a /31
> (255.255.255.254) instead of a /32 (255.255.255.255) mask?
>
> sebastian
>

I tried with
ifconfig upl0 inet 10.200.200.1 10.200.200.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 up
I also tried without netmask, same result.

the routing looks like the following:
netstat -rn

Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Mtu Interface
Default ...
10.200.200.2 10.200.200.1 UH 0 0 - upl0
...

I cannot ping 10.200.200.1 nor 10.200.200.2 from this host.

So I assume it must sth. else.

greetings
Lars

--
Bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten sparen: GMX SmartSurfer!
Kostenlos downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]