|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: (OT: PostgreSQL vs MySQL)
From: Randal L. Schwartz (merlyn
stonehenge.com)
Date: Thu Apr 06 2006 - 20:12:59 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>>>> "Craig" == Craig Skinner <craig.skinner
kepax.co.uk> writes:
Craig> MySQL is a wee bit faster,
I keep seeing this, but I sometimes see the opposite. That "MySQL is faster"
meme seems peristent though, as if the PostgreSQL want to provide *some*
justification for people to continue to have a reason for MySQL.
Given the cost of programmer time (and the cost of lost data) vs the
cost of a slightly faster processor, is it ever really worth it even
if MySQL is *twice* as fast?
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn
stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]