From: Theo de Raadt (deraadtcvs.openbsd.org)
Date: Sat Sep 01 2007 - 18:46:30 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 04:55:34PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > The license is not an alternative. The alternative is between two licenses.
> > >
> > > The moment one chooses one them... it's that one henceforth.
> >
> > And... you are a judge?
>
> Theo, be as unreasonable as you want.

I am not being unreasonable. You are not a judge, so stop acting like
you are one. You don't know the full story. I do not know the full
story either. But you are being a real prick on the lists here acting
as if you have everything all figured out, you, the judge.

> The copyright notice tells the user he can choose between two licenses.
> If you choose the GNU GPL vs, you can't later on change to BSD or
> proprietary for that would be a copyright violation.
>
> *Copyright notice != license*

I am glad you are so sure, so confident. Are you placing money on the
outcome? Many many other people are NOT SO SURE AT ALL.

So leave it, ok?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]