From: Alexander Burnos (alexlocalhost.org.ua)
Date: Thu Jan 17 2008 - 10:06:45 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello!

On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:58:16PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Since we don't currently support route priorities, I think that might
> be the cleanest workaround. Another way is to add a static route (just
> a /32 would do) to a host which you can connect from if there's a
> problem, but that's much more of a hack.

Thanks for that idea. Probably I'll use this hack, I like it :)

> look for a route for the destination and if it can't find one, stops
> processing the packet with EHOSTUNREACH.

Ah, I see now. Thank you for this explaination.

--
WBR,
Alexander Burnos

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]