|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Adam Jacob Muller (lists
adam.gs)
Date: Tue Feb 26 2008 - 22:54:01 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
pop-before-smtp is highly insecure.
Use SMTP auth.
-Adam
On Feb 26, 2008, at 6:33 PM, Juan Miscaro wrote:
> --- Cameron Schaus <cam
schaus.ca> wrote:
>
>> Juan Miscaro wrote:
>>> Are there standard solutions for dealing with the obvious collision
>>> between pop-before-smtp and spamd (in greylisting mode)? I know
>> many
>>> will say to use SMTP AUTH but right now I want to try to get my
>> current
>>> setup to work. My first idea was to hack the pop-before-smtp Perl
>>> script to have the thing (daemon) add connecting/authenticating
>> sender
>>> IPs to a pf whitelist table. I'm running OpenBSD 4.2 (stable) with
>>> Postfix 2.5.
>>>
>> Why not use port 587 to send mail, instead of port 25, and only allow
>>
>> SMTP Auth from this port.
>
>
> Right now I'm talking about using pop-before-smtp.
>
> /juan
>
>
> Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!
>
> http://www.flickr.com/gift/
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]