From: Ermal Luçi (ermal.lucigmail.com)
Date: Sat Mar 01 2008 - 06:09:07 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Stuart Henderson <stuspacehopper.org> wrote:
> On 2008/03/01 12:10, Ermal Lugi wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Stuart Henderson <stuspacehopper.org>
wrote:
> > > On 2008/03/01 11:24, Ermal Lugi wrote:
> > > > > | [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-patch which
had a name of pf_dscp.diff]
> > > > >
> > > > > And your patch got stripped - please include inline ;)
> > > >
> > > > Here is the patch:
> > >
> > > there was me hoping it was going to be something for scrub to
> > > set/clear them :-)
> > >
> > >
> > What do you mean?
>
> It would definitely be nice to be able to clear DSCP bits from
> untrusted systems. It might also be useful to some people if they
> could add/change DSCP from a PF rule (i.e. mark certain traffic
> with certain DSCP, based on interface/port/IP address/etc).
>
>
Well it is on my plans together with ALTQ_CDNR which implements
diffserv policying.
Original ALTQ has an option you can pass to queues to clear diffserv
codepoint and i am going to reintegrate that with all the above and i
hope that OpenBSD is opened to accept those changes.

That is the whole point of this message to poll the OpenBSD ecosystem
rules so this changes get accepted.

Ermal

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]