Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email firstname.lastname@example.org
From: Philip Guenther (guenthergmail.com)
Date: Wed Oct 08 2008 - 15:17:24 CDT
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Otto Moerbeek <ottodrijf.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 12:44:43PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Peter J. Philipp <pjpsolarscale.de> wrote:
>> > I'm not just seeing this wrong I hope. Let me explain:
>> > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/net/if_tun.c
>> > when looking at the top seeing the change 1.95 done by brad, but when
>> > selecting to see diffs with 1.94 the change in $OpenBSD$ tag reflects damien
>> > and mpf who were the committers one commit before 1.95. This causes a bit
>> > of confusion on my part, for who committed what, what are brad's changes?
>> > Is CVSWEB broken?
>> No, that's just the way CVS keywords work: the expansion is done at
>> *checkout* and not at commit. This can be seen using the -ko option
>> to "cvs up" or "cvs co" to disable the expansion done at checkout
>> time. Just trust what you see on the revision listing and ignore the
>> keywords in the diff output.
> but when I do a
> cvs diff -r 1.94 -r 1.95 if_tun.c
> on my local mirror i'm seeing the right $OpenBSD$ markers. Compere the
> output below to
> I'd say something's fishy here.
Hmm, good point. It's like it passes the -ko option to cvs diff. Or
does cvsweb implement the diff itself internally? It has to peek
directly at the RCS files to get some of the other stuff it shows, no?