From: Brad (bradcomstyle.com)
Date: Wed Aug 25 2010 - 09:01:33 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wednesday 25 August 2010 09:50:48 Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:00:27 +0200
>
> Henning Brauer <lists-openbsdtechbsws.de> wrote:
> > * Gregory Edigarov <gregbestnet.kharkov.ua> [2010-08-25 11:03]:
> > > There is something I never understand: why change more for less?
> > > i.e. why change bind which is feature reach and mature for
> > > nsd/unbound, that doesn't have 2/3 of bind features.
> >
> > because bind is a misdesigned piece of shit.
>
> well, I can understand it, but, then why only nsd to the base, and not
> unbound?

That was already mentioned and is pending.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]