Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email firstname.lastname@example.org
From: Amit Kulkarni (amitkulzgmail.com)
Date: Thu Apr 26 2012 - 17:04:21 CDT
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Gilles Chehade <gillespoolp.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 08:52:03PM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Lars Hansson <romabysengmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Mihai Popescu <mihscugmail.com> wrote:
>> >> This is interesting too (first paragraph), from the Ion author:
>> >> http://tuomov.iki.fi/software
>> > Guess why Ion3 isn't in ports anymore.
>> Or more correctly, guess why it's a stone-age version.
> bleh ... it does what it advertizes and works pretty fine, I've used it
> for years and the fact that it's a "stone age" version does not prevent
> me from working with it both at home & at work.
> the reason why i like it is precisely because it's simple and doesn't
> come with tons of features that change all of the time, it's the same
> look & feel on all systems I use, and has been like that for years.
Yes, I concur with this sentiment. Having tried many WMs, and doing
repetitive wiping of installs/port building that you eventually want
stability and not go hunting why this or that broke. It just diverts
your time away from your planned work for that day. So I now use the
default fvwm like Marc says he does, but I am looking for a very fast
compiled lightweight WM, and will try out the alternatives :-)