|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Brad (brad
comstyle.com)Date: Sun Aug 19 2001 - 20:43:14 CDT
The standalone support in popa3d is the reason why it was moved.
It either uses standalone support OR run from inetd but not both at the
moment.
// Brad
brad
comstyle.com
brad
openbsd.org
>On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 07:05:57AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> CVSROOT: /cvs
>> Module name: src
>> Changes by: deraadt
cvs.openbsd.org 2001/08/19 07:05:57
>>
>> Added files:
>> usr.sbin/popa3d: DESIGN LICENSE Makefile VIRTUAL auth_passwd.c
>> database.c database.h mailbox.c mailbox.h
>> misc.c misc.h params.h pop_auth.c pop_auth.h
>> pop_root.c pop_trans.c pop_trans.h popa3d.8
>> protocol.c protocol.h standalone.c virtual.c
>> virtual.h
>> Removed files:
>> libexec/popa3d : DESIGN LICENSE Makefile VIRTUAL auth_passwd.c
>> database.c database.h mailbox.c mailbox.h
>> misc.c misc.h params.h pop_auth.c pop_auth.h
>> pop_root.c pop_trans.c pop_trans.h popa3d.8
>> protocol.c protocol.h standalone.c virtual.c
>> virtual.h
>>
>> Log message:
>> libexec is the wrong place for popa3d, since it can be started WITHOUT inetd
>
> hrm, if we ever add stand alone support, is this ok to live in usr.sbin?
>
> f.-
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]